|
|
Films go
through many transformations as they are copied or transferred to video,
but the most important visual aspects of a film are those that can give
clues to its production. What can we see about how the film was made
by looking at the film itself? How was it shot and how was it arranged
for the camera? Was the camera on location or in a studio? Where was
the camera placed and why was it placed there? What sort of lenses were
used? Did the camera operator use artificial or available light? Was
the scene specially arranged for the camera and how was it framed? What
angle of view was it taken from? Was the camera on a tripod or hand-held?
If there was camera movement, how was it done? After examining individual
shots, you must also consider how the film was edited. What scenes may
have been cut out by the editor? How do shots begin and end? With the
shots that follow each other, how much time actually took place between
them? Do the shots form a sequence or are they only loosely connected?
If they form a sequence, did the original event really occur in this
order?
While many
of these questions (such as what footage was cut in the editing process)
cannot be answered with certainty by simply examining the film, careful
examination can reveal some important features. Only rarely are sets
so convincing that a viewer cannot tell if the film was shot on a set
or not. The image reveals camera angle, distance, composition, and even
lenses. Occasionally such aspects can be very revealing of a film's
authenticity. A too carefully arranged composition -- such as camera
operators capturing a battle from an ideal viewpoint that would have
placed them in mortal danger from enemy fire -- can reveal it as a re-enactment.
Editing
can make historical interpretation of film tricky for three reasons.
First, it can utterly re-work or determine the meaning of a film sequence.
Second, it can be done after the filming. Third, films can be re-edited
in ways not immediately obvious to a viewer. Many early filmmakers and
theorists understood editing as perhaps the most powerful tool filmmakers
had for making meaning. While a single shot usually supplies some sort
of record of what the camera filmed (even if artificially arranged),
editing always presents a reconstruction and can greatly change the
meaning of what was shot, creating relationships of space and time that
may not have existed originally.
As I mentioned
earlier, one must be especially aware of editing when watching a compilation
film. Editors can create a sequence of a battle, a riot, or a political
convention by cutting between combatants or political orators and their
audiences, but they are combining shots taken at very different times
and sometimes different places. Thus, in Hearts of the World,
a fictional feature film made during W.W.I., D.W. Griffith used documentary
images of the war to heighten the film's drama. But as film historian
Russell Merritt has shown, the images that seem to show one battle actually
combine footage from several events and even mix footage shot by both
British and German cameramen.
Early filmmakers
often created stories and illusions out of different, unrelated, film
clips. In this exercise, you need to arrange these four early film clips
to create a narrative. Drag the clips in the sequence that you think tells
the best story and then click the Play Movie button. When you're finished,
select the commentary button for more information on film editing.
|